Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Piha

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1929No. 6913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

A tenant instituted an action to enjoin his landlord from declaring forfeiture of the lease and taking possession .of the property. On exception to an order granting a temporary injunction the judgment of the trial court was reversed. Byrd v. Piha, 165 Ga. 397 (141 S. E. 48). Subsequently an amendment to the defendant’s original answer set up a money demand for double rent. On the trial all questions were eliminated except the defendant’s right to double rent. On this question the judge directed a verdict against the allowance of double rent. The defendant excepted. In the circumstances the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PihaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Brandt v. BuckleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Cochran v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. City of Reynolds v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Gilbert Hotel No. 22 Inc. v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Martin v. Home Owners Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Candler v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Spence v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API