Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Camden Savings Bank

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 29, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On report. Writ of entry by the plaintiffs as receivers and trustees of the Mt. Battie Mfg. Co,, for the purpose of determining the title to certain real estate in Camden, formerly the property of said company. The plaintiffs claimed the same as receivers and trustees duly appointed, while the defendant claimed under an execution sale of the same as the property of said company. Plea, the general issue.

Read the full summary

On report. Writ of entry by the plaintiffs as receivers and trustees of the Mt. Battie Mfg. Co,, for the purpose of determining the title to certain real estate in Camden, formerly the property of said company. The plaintiffs claimed the same as receivers and trustees duly appointed, while the defendant claimed under an execution sale of the same as the property of said company. Plea, the general issue. When the action came on for trial, an agreed statement of facts was filed and the case was reported to the Law Court for determination. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.

Real action. The plaintiffs are the receivers, and trustees appointed under the provisions of sections 80 and 81 of chapter 47 of the Revised Statutes, of the Mount Battie Manufacturing Company, which prior to the proceedings hereinafter mentioned was the owner of the demanded premises. The defendant is the purchaser of the same under an execution sale, the validity of which is presented for the determination of the court.

On December 26, 1905, Brown & Adams, of Boston, creditors of the corporation, brought suit against it, and on the same day caused its real estate to be attached on their…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  4. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. Davis v. Cox (In Re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2002
  5. Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API