Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1926No. 24,751PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This will contest is here for the second time, the opinion on the first appeal appearing in 156 Minn. 144, 194 N. W. 330. It is unnecessary to restate the facts or much of the history of the case. Two wills are involved, one of February, 1911, and the other of May, 1916. The effort of Miss Boynton is to establish the latter and the revocation of the 1911 will. On the first trial, answering two special questions, a jury found that the destruction of the first will, which took place concurrently with the execution of the last, was induced by the undue influence of Miss Boynton, and that the new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boynton v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Central Metropolitan Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Buzalsky v. BuzalskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orr v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Matter of Estate of PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. First National Bank v. QuevliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Close v. FlanaryNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Orr v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API