Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1923No. 23,367PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Lucy D. Simmons made two wills, one in February, 1911, the other in May, 1916. The first will was destroyed in May, 1916, when the second one was made. The 1916 will contained no revoking clause. The probate court admitted the 1916 will to probate. On appeal to the district court these two questions were submitted to the jury:

1. Was the first will of Lucy D. Simmons, which was executed in February, 1911, and which was destroyed in May, 1916, so destroyed by reason oif undue influence exerted by Frances L. Boyn-ton?

2. Was the second will of Lucy D. Simmons, which was executed in May, 1916,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischer v. SperlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. In re the Estate of JernbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Howard v. FarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Prescott v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Lestico v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Estate of Keeley v. OchsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Lhotka v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. York v. ReaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API