Legal Opinion
State v. Kronich
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 7, 2006No. 23427-4-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
128 P.3d 119 (2006)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Kyle K. KRONICH, Appellant.
No. 23427-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
February 7, 2006.
Tracy A. Staab, Federal Public Defenders, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Brian C. O'Brien, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
BROWN, J.
¶ 1 Kyle K. Kronich appeals his convictions for driving while under the influence (DUI) and third degree driving while license suspended. He contends (1) his breath test refusal should have been suppressed because he was denied an attorney and (2) a Department of Licensing (DOL)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KronichWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Card v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Sproule v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.