Schaefer v. . Thompson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hiscock, Ch. J.
This action was brought to enforce the specific performance of an option given by defendant to plaintiff for a valuable consideration to purchase certain real estate, and which was set forth in a lease given by defendant to plaintiff of the premises in question for a term of three years expiring April 30, 1921. The agreement reads as follows: “ And the party of the first part (the defendant) gives to the -party of the second part (the plaintiff) privilege of purchasing the premises (those in question) at any time before the expiration of this lease for the sum of $7,500.”
Plainti…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Andreula v. Slovak Gymnastic Union Sokol Assembly No. 223Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Peripheral Equipment, Inc. v. Farrington Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Tubbs v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Fuller v. DilbertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Ludlam Stead, Ltd. v. RezzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.