Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. . Thompson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hiscock, Ch. J.

This action was brought to enforce the specific performance of an option given by defendant to plaintiff for a valuable consideration to purchase certain real estate, and which was set forth in a lease given by defendant to plaintiff of the premises in question for a term of three years expiring April 30, 1921. The agreement reads as follows: “ And the party of the first part (the defendant) gives to the -party of the second part (the plaintiff) privilege of purchasing the premises (those in question) at any time before the expiration of this lease for the sum of $7,500.”

Plainti…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andreula v. Slovak Gymnastic Union Sokol Assembly No. 223Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  2. Peripheral Equipment, Inc. v. Farrington Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. Tubbs v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fuller v. DilbertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Ludlam Stead, Ltd. v. RezzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API