Bragado v. Cherry Electrical Products Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn
Plaintiff, Amorfina Bragado, appeals from the order of the trial court dismissing her amended complaint for retaliatory discharge for failure to state a claim pursuant to motions brought under section 2— 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2—615). Plaintiff had filed a complaint alleging retaliatory discharge by defendant, Cherry Electrical Products Corporation (Cherry), her employer, and defendant Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. (Wetzel), its adjustment agent. Both defendants filed motions which argued that the complaint failed to state a cause of action and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Collier v. Wagner Castings Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Hinthorn v. Roland's of Bloomington, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Robertson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hartlein v. Illinois Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Buckner v. Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Zimmerman v. Buchheit of Sparta, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Anthony Prince v. Rescorp Realty, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Miller v. J.M. Jones Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.