Legal Opinion
Cardona v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 20, 1996No. Civil Action 95-2973, 95-1476PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
ORLOFSKY, District Judge:
Appellants, Jay M. London, Esq. (“London” or “appellant”), and the law firm of Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. (“K & S” or “appellant”), have filed a motion to amend an Order entered by this Court on August 8, 1996. By its August 8, 1996, Opinion and Order, this court affirmed a decision of the magistrate judge disqualifying London and K & S from further representing plaintiffs in these actions. London and K & S seek certification of this Order for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
Appellants have…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- In Re Cendant Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Florence v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Arnold, White & Durkee v. Gotcha Covered, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- IN RE COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.