Legal Opinion

Lesane v. Chandler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1970No. 7013SC223PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkitt, J.

Did Russell Lennon die intestate as to the lands in controversy? Construing the instrument in light of the following propositions, we conclude that he did not.

1. The dispositive word “bequeath” is sufficient to include both personalty and realty. Case v. Biberstein, 207 N.C. 514, 177 S.E. 802.

2. In its technical sense, “estate” refers to the degree, quantity, nature and extent of a person’s interest in land. Nicholson Corp. v. Ferguson, 114 Okla. 16, 243 P. 195. In its ordinary usage, “estate” embraces a testator’s entire property, real and personal. See Trust Co. v. Wolfe, 243 N.C. 469, 91…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Nicholson Corporation v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Caracci v. SchnaedterIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Holmes v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greneker v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Watson v. SmokerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API