Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wood v. Irving

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993Published

1Dissent

Lawton and Davis, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent because we believe that Civil Service Law § 58 (4) (c), as written, violates article V, § 6 of the New York Constitution. Whether an examination is practicable is usually determined by the examining authority subject to judicial review (see, e.g., Matter of Berkowitz v New York State Civ. Serv. Commn., 150 AD2d 978, lv denied 74 NY2d 610). Likewise, the State Legislature has the right to make that determination, which is also subject to judicial scrutiny (see, e.g., Sanger v Greene, 269 NY 33, rearg denied 269 NY 613; Birkeland v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Sanger v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Birkeland v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Birkeland v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Berkowitz v. New York State Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API