Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Landis v. Morrow County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2000No. 00-288PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

We deny the writ for the following reasons.

First, res judicata bars Landis’s present action. “A valid, final judgment rendered upon the merits bars all subsequent actions based upon any claim arising out of the transaction * * * that was the subject matter of the previous action.” Grava v. Parkman Twp. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 379, 653 N.E.2d 226, syllabus. Further, as we held in State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 184-186, 685 N.E.2d 507, 509-510, in the absence of any language in the entry to the contrary, a dismissal for want of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Ryant Committee v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Paschal v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Choices for South-Western City Schools v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hughes v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hughes v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API