Legal Opinion
Kohler v. McClellan
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 21, 1948No. Civil. Action 753PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORAH, District Judge.
To make intelligible the questions here presented, a history of this litigation must be given.
Oh July 2, 1943, Max N. Kohler, a citizen of Mississippi and a director and shareholder of the Crescent City Laundries, Inc., a Maine corporation, hereinafter at times called “Crescent,” brought this action for himself and on behalf of others similarly situated against certain officers and directors of Crescent, and other persons and corporations, who are citizens of Louisiana and of other states except Mississippi, for breaches of trust, ultra vires acts, diversion and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Klein v. Board of Tax Supervisors of Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Robinson v. Snell's Limbs and Braces of New Orleans, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Morgan v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.