Connors v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
McNamee, J. (dissenting).
The defendant is a railroad corporation engaged in interstate commerce, and employed the plaintiff as a section hand. The defendant has a main line of railroad running through the city of Binghamton, and also a side track connected therewith by a crossover, known as Shay’s siding, and it devoted both of these to interstate transportation. The defendant was making a number of alterations and improvements in its Binghamton yard, and among these was the installation of an added crossover to connect the main line of its railroad with Shay’s siding a few feet away. In…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.