United States v. Sandoval-Landeros
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.*
Pedro Sandoval-Landeros appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). Sandoval-Landeros acknowledges that his arguments, which are raised for the first time on appeal, are foreclosed. He raises the issues to preserve them for further review.
Sandoval-Landeros’s argument that his conviction and sentence are void because *438his plea allocution was delegated to a non-Article III magistrate judge is without merit. That task may be constitutionally delegated to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bolivar-MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004