Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Stewart
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 28, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeliveau, J.
On exception. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted. Exception was taken.
The plaintiff’s action is to recover damages suffered by him when struck by an automobile operated by the defendant.
The uncontradicted evidence shows that on the morning of January 8, 1956, about 6:30, the plaintiff coming from his work at the Maine Central Railroad, was walking southerly on the westerly side of College Avenue in Waterville when he was struck by an automobile operated by the defendant.
The plaintiff was an employee of the Maine Central Railroad and had been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stearns v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- Hamilton v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stella Reyes, Administratrix of the Estate of Florentino Reyes, Deceased v. Vantage Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Richardson v. GrezeszakMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Hillock ex rel. Hillock v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Swoboda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Stella Reyes, Administratrix of the Estate of Florentino Reyes, Deceased v. Vantage Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.