Legal Opinion

Maslenjak v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 2017No. 16–309PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kagan

A federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1425 (a), makes it a crime to "knowingly *1923 procure[ ], contrary to law, the naturalization of any person." And when someone is convicted under § 1425(a) of unlawfully procuring her own naturalization, her citizenship is automatically revoked. See 8 U.S.C. § 1451 (e). In this case, we consider what the Government must prove to obtain such a conviction. We hold that the Government must establish that an illegal act by the defendant played some role in her acquisition of citizenship. When the illegal act is a false statement, that means demonstrating that the…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment · Gorsuch; Concurring in the judgment · Alito.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. L. Xia v. Rex TillersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. SEC v. JarkesySupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  3. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  5. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Sonny PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API