Legal Opinion

Mutual Fire Insurance v. Eicholtz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Dobles., J.) where the case was tried before the Court without a jury and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

On the 27th July, 1894, the plaintiff, Anderson Eicholtz, received from the defendant, the Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Baltimore County, a policy of insurance on his mill property located in Frederick County. According to the terms of this policy the property therein mentioned was insured from the 27th July, 1894, to the 1st of March, 1902. The consideration for this policy was the delivery by the insured to the company of his note for $240, together with an agreement on his *94part to pay in advance the annual interest thereon before the 1st March at 12 o’clock M. in each and every year,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maryland Fire Insurance v. GusdorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mallette Ex Rel. Thomas v. British American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Travelers Insurance v. MelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Baltimore Life Insurance v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Eureka-Maryland Assurance Corp. v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. JeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API