Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Melman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 28, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Digges, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

During the year 1922 Louis Bridge was employed as an insurance agent by the Travelers Insurance Company, a corporation, of Hartford, Connecticut^ duly authorized to do- business in the State of Maryland. This agent had authority to- solicit insurance, take applications, deliver poli cies, and to collect first premiums. In the course of his employment he, after repeated solicitation, succeeded in obtaining an application on June 16th, 1922, from Harry Melman, whose residence and place of business was in Baltimore City, for a policy of insurance upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallette Ex Rel. Thomas v. British American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Alexander v. Continental Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. New York Life Ins. v. CloptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
  4. Mutual Fire Insurance v. EicholtzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. American Casualty Co. v. RicasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Hankins v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Bitting v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Wanshura v. State Farm Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API