Legal Opinion
Mink v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1992No. G011930PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALLIN, J.
Larry Mink, Charles Wentworth and Penelope Wentworth (collectively Mink and Wentworth) petition for a writ of mandamus ordering the superior court to grant their motions for reconsideration of, and relief from, its order granting summary adjudication and dismissing several causes of action on the grounds they were time barred. After the dismissal, Mink and Wentworth discovered that because of an intervening weekend and court holiday the complaint was timely filed. We grant the writ.
Mink and Wentworth are some of the plaintiffs in an action against Arnel Development Company,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Corns v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Thai v. StangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- New York Times Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Avila v. ChuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Baldwin v. Home Savings of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.