Legal Opinion

In re Stevens

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided January 31, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

The objections of the trustee to the sufficiency in law of the last amended proofs of the claim of the Lamoille County National Bank have now been heard.

'. Amendments are allowed for the correction of misdescriptions and minor inaccuracies in the statement of substantially the same claim, but not to new claims after the timé for filing claims has expired; and the sufficiency of the amended proofs is to be determined upon their face, without reference to prior ones, except as to whether they are for substantially the same claim.

The objection to the oath, is not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langdon & Ainsworth v. BowenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re FantDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1927
  2. In Re LanmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. Orr v. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910
  4. In re United Wireless Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1912
  5. In re Coventry Evans Furniture Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API