Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 15, 2005No. 02-2042PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 27, 2002, alleging, inter alia, that he is entitled to recover military pay under 10 U.S.C. § 1552, which allows for the correction of military records and governs claims incident thereto, because he was improperly discharged from the United States Army after he resigned in lieu of a court-martial. Compl. 1ÍH1, 9. Soon after the case was filed, Plaintiff filed a consent motion to stay proceedings while two military appeals boards reviewed his case. The Court granted Plaintiffs motion in May 2003. Both boards ren*489dered…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Albino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Lopez-Velazquez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Ronald J. Helferty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Brookins v. Untied StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API