In Re Upshaw
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
■STAKELY, Justice.
We acknowledge receipt of your inquiry as to whether the Act of the Legislature, No. 426, approved July 7, 1945, amending Title 42, Code 1940, is contrary to the Constitution of the State of Alabama and especially contrary to Section 45 thereof and Amendment 38 thereof. We understand that the foregoing has been submitted to this court pursuant to Section 98, Title 13, Code 1940. We further understand that the constitutional questions relating to the aforesaid Act have arisen under the following circumstances:
Frank Upshaw was convicted and adjudged guilty in the 'Circuit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Persall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pinkerton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Houston County v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Advisory Opinion to the SenateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Seven Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- City of Birmingham v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- King v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Marks v. TenbrunselSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.