Legal Opinion

State v. Kimbrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1987No. 83A87PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The issue presented is whether the trial court committed reversible error by permitting the State, over objection, to cross-examine defendant about his knowledge of and participation in “devil worshipping” activities. The Court of Appeals found the evidence to be inadmissible under N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rules 610 and 403, but held that its admission did not constitute reversible error. We agree that the evidence was inadmissible. However, we find that defendant was indeed prejudiced by its admission, and we therefore reverse.

The State’s evidence established that on 19 May 1984,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ainsworth Corp. v. Cenco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. ChuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. State v. WaterhouseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. GarcellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. LovinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. Shamsid-DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API