State v. Waterhouse
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
Defendant Scott Waterhouse appeals his conviction of murder, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 201(1)(A) (1983), after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Lincoln County). Defendant contends that the Superior Court erred in conducting a general voir dire of two jury panels on the issue of satanism without affording the defendant a prior opportunity to conduct individual voir dire on that issue and in admitting evidence of his belief in satanism at trial. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
I
In a pretrial conference, defense counsel asked for permission to conduct individual voir dire of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. LangleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- State v. MoodySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. ThibeaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. OldsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Grayson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- State v. BowmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- People v. GriffinColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. PattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.