Legal Opinion

State v. Waterhouse

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 15, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Scott Waterhouse appeals his conviction of murder, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 201(1)(A) (1983), after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Lincoln County). Defendant contends that the Superior Court erred in conducting a general voir dire of two jury panels on the issue of satanism without affording the defendant a prior opportunity to conduct individual voir dire on that issue and in admitting evidence of his belief in satanism at trial. We affirm the judgment of conviction.

I

In a pretrial conference, defense counsel asked for permission to conduct individual voir dire of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. LangleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  4. State v. MoodySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. ThibeaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. OldsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Grayson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. State v. BowmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. People v. GriffinColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. PattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API