Legal Opinion

United States v. Maldonado-Rios

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 15, 2015No. 14-1357PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal requires us to make clear the procedure that a district court should follow when a defendant moves to modify a sentence during the pendency of an appeal of that sentence. As we explain, in a case like this, that procedure is set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1, which provides for the use of an indicative ruling by the district court in such circumstance. Here, however, lacking any direct guidance from this Court as to the procedure it should follow, the District Court did not issue an indicative ruling but instead simply issued a modification order. We hold that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. Louis Distasio, Sr., United States of America v. Jerry J. DistasioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Leonard Bobby OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Torres-OliverasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. George, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. Bernardo Mendia v. John GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. DeCambre v. Brookline Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. NaphaengCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API