Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thompson-Starrett Co. v. La Belle Iron Works

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 14, 1927No. 144Published

1DissentManton, Circuit Judge

The contract sued on is for service and the furnishing of materials and labor on a cost plus basis in the construction of houses. The owner agreed to pay such costs incurred by the contractor in performance of the construction work plus a fee of 6 per cent, .of the cost. The action seeks to recover an unpaid balance of $128,351.75.

The main defense presented to us is that paragraph III of the contract, providing that “it is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the work included in this contract is to be done under the direction and to the satisfaction of the general…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Aronstam v. All-Russian Central Union of Consumers' Societies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. J. H. Sullivan Co. v. WingerathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API