Aronstam v. All-Russian Central Union of Consumers' Societies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Charles S. Aronstam against the All-Russian Central Union of Consumers’ Societies, Incorporated. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error is an attorney at law engaged in practicing his profession in the city of New York. The efficient services which he performed in the companion cases, which grew out of his negotiations with the government,.in behalf of the Union of Siberian Co-operative Unions, Incorporated, and the Union of Siberian Creamery Associations, make a record of fidelity. The services rendered were unique and unusual, and secured for clients whom he represented contracts with the federal government, in very considerable sums, for the purchase of materials. He was obliged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Roberts v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Clement v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wallace v. FiskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- S. B. Brinson and Leota L. Brinson v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Dunbar Bros. Co. v. Consolidated Iron Steel Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Dalton v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.