Legal Opinion

State v. Cochran, 22240 (7-18-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2008No. 22240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The issue this appeal presents is whether the facts, the truth of which Defendant, Waymon Cochran, admitted in his plea of no contest per Crim.R. 11(B)(2), were sufficient as a matter of law for the court to find him guilty of the misdemeanor offense of which he was convicted.

{¶ 2} Defendant was convicted of a violation of R.C. 4510.16(A). That section provides, in pertinent part: "No person, whose driver's license . . . has been suspended . . . pursuant to Chapter 4509 of the Revised Code, shall operate any motor vehicle within this state . . ." R.C.4509.101 prohibits operation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. McGloneOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Dayton v. AhmadOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. BlountOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Cleveland v. PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API