State v. Cochran, 22240 (7-18-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} The issue this appeal presents is whether the facts, the truth of which Defendant, Waymon Cochran, admitted in his plea of no contest per Crim.R. 11(B)(2), were sufficient as a matter of law for the court to find him guilty of the misdemeanor offense of which he was convicted.
{¶ 2} Defendant was convicted of a violation of R.C. 4510.16(A). That section provides, in pertinent part: "No person, whose driver's license . . . has been suspended . . . pursuant to Chapter 4509 of the Revised Code, shall operate any motor vehicle within this state . . ." R.C.4509.101 prohibits operation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. McGloneOhio Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Dayton v. AhmadOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. BlountOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Cleveland v. PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.