Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. Nos. 93-1098 and 94-38PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The principal issue presented by these cases involves an interpretation of the word “operate,” as that term is used in R.C. 4511.19. Specifically, we are asked to determine whether a person can be found in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1) and (3) where the person is found intoxicated and in the driver’s seat of a parked vehicle with the ignition key in the ignition and the vehicle’s engine not running.

R.C. 4511.19(A)(1) and (3) provide: “No person shall operate any vehicle, streetcar, or trackless trolley within this state, if any of the following apply: (1) The person is under the influence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. McGloneOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. BlantonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API