Legal Opinion

In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1988No. TECA No. 10-74PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Judge.

Before this court is an appeal of the district court’s denial of intervention in In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation, M.D.L. No. 378 (D.Kan.). Appellants have challenged both the district court’s jurisdiction and its determination that the requirements for intervention under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have not been met. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

I. Background

Appellants are a group of six electric utility companies, fourteen shipping companies, and four paper manufacturers (Utilities,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Koch Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. AlaskaTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. In Re: The Department of Energy Stripper Well Litigation. The States of Alabama, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, South Dakota, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming v. United States Department of Energy and Chevron U.S.A. Inc., the States of Alabama, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, South Dakota, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming v. United States Department of Energy, Hazel O'leary, Secretary Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, George B. Breznay, Director, - and Chevron, Usa, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Rhode Island and West Virginia, the Territory of Guam and the Virgin Islands v. United States Department of Energy, and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API