Legal Opinion

Keneco v. Cantrell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1977No. 13551PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. W. LESSLEY, District Judge,

setting in place of Mr. Chief Justice, Paul G. Hatfield, delivered the opinion of the court.

This litigation arises from a conflict of brothers-in-law in the creation and operation a family corporation.

Keneco is the family corporation; it sells, installs, and repairs service station equipment. From 1965 to 1970 the only directors and stockholders were Kenik, his wife Elizabeth, and Cantrell and his wife Helen; Helen Cantrell is Raymond Kenik’s sister. The wives did not actually participate in the corporation’s business.

In 1962 Kenik purchased Marketing Specialties…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crncevich v. Georgetown Recreation CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Spencer v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kearns v. McIntyre Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Smith v. KrutarMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cope v. CopeMontana Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schneider v. LeaphartMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Montana Pole & Treating Plant v. IF Laucks and Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1991
  3. Yellowstone Conference of the United Methodist Church v. D.A. Davidson, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Buhl v. Biosearch Medical Products, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1985
  5. In Re the Adoption of D. J. V.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API