Tilles v. Department of Labor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The Special Term correctly held that there is an issue of fact as to whether petitioners were duly appointed from the appropriate eligible lists or whether their appointments gave them only a de facto status until the appointment of others who were inadvertently passed over. The statute requires that appointments shall be made from among those graded highest in open competitive examinations (Civ. Serv. Law, § 14) and that appointments shall be made to all positions by selection of one of the three persons who are willing to accept and are graded highest on the most nearly appropriate eligible…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Balcom v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Koso v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gould v. NewtonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Tilles v. Department of Labor of the StateNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Waters v. BuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942