Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Fredericksen
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lincoln county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
This action was brought to recover the balance due. plaintiff upon a contract for the sale of a computing scale. Plaintiff failed in the action, and appeals to this court.
Defendant bought the scale on September 5,1910, under a printed and written contract, which in substance provided that the scale will be used in the grocery business, that the price should be $150, $50 of which was paid in cash when the contract was signed, and $100 was to be paid in 30 days. The contract also provided: “It is expressly agreed that this contract shall not be countermanded, and in the event of a refusal to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Omaha Coal, Coke & Lime Co. v. FayNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- F. H. Gilcrest Lumber Co. v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marx v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. Farmers Co-operative Creamery & Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
- Plymouth Cordage Co. v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 1919