Legal Opinion
Huntington Pennysaver, Inc. v. Tire Supply Corp.
Suffolk County District Court
Decided March 10, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam M. Perry, J.
Trial of the above matter held on the 3d day of January, 1969, at the Third District Court of the County of Suffolk, at Huntington, New York. After trial the court finds the facts to be as follows:
The defendant Tire Supply had, for a period of time prior to May of 1967, placed advertisements in the plaintiff, Penny-saver, newspaper. Thereafter, advertisements for Tire Supply were placed by the defendant Palmer, Willson and Worden, Inc., an advertising agency. These advertisements were placed with the plaintiff by insert orders on the defendant Palmer’s letterhead, wherein a description of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eddy v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Green v. DonigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Meyer v. . RedmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gillis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Delancey Kosher Restaurant & Caterers Corp. v. GlucksternNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ingrassia v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Carruthers v. FlaumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Shiah M. Arsham v. Walter BanciCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Alentino, Ltd., Nas Import Corp., Alentino, Ltd. v. Chenson Enterprises, Inc., K-World Trading Co., We Care Trading Co., Ltd., Bag-Plus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- New York Times Co. v. Glynn-Palmer Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988