Legal Opinion

Jones v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 5, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltimore City (Wickes, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

This case was commenced by a bill in equity which was filed to enforce specifically the performance of a contract for the sale of a lot of ground lying in Baltimore City. The contract is admitted. The purchaser refused to accept the title and to pay for the property solely because it is alleged that the vendors are not the owners of the fee ; and it is insisted that they are not the owners of the fee by reason of there being an outstanding ground rent charged upon the lot. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. Cifcuit Court No. 2 decreed that the purchaser should forthwith…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Funk v. NewcomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  2. Lloyd v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Camp v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. MarburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Eareckson v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Oxenham v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Hamburger v. FinkelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API