Legal Opinion

Grunberg v. Grunberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the fourth and fifth causes of action contained in plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that they are legally insufficient.

The fourth cause of action alleges that plaintiff and defendant were married on November 21, 1947, in London, England, that prior to said marriage and in order to induce plaintiff to consent thereto defendant falsely and fraudulently represented to plaintiff that she loved him and would be a faithful and dutiful wife and would live up to her obligations as such, that plaintiff *250believed such representations to be true and in reliance thereon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Wells v. PadgettNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Andie v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Sulkowski v. SzewczykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Friedman v. LibinNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Easley v. NealNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Tuck v. TuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. Duttenhofer v. DuttenhoferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API