State v. Rose
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The issue certified to this court is whether a defendant can be convicted of R.C. 2913.03, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, where the defendant’s possession or use was initially authorized by the owner of the vehicle, but possession or use thereafter extended beyond the scope of the owner’s consent. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the affirmative.
R.C. 2913.03 provides:
“(A) No person shall knowingly use or operate an aircraft, motor vehicle, motorcycle, motorboat, or other motor-propelled vehicle without the consent of the owner or person authorized to give consent.
“(B)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by8 opinions
- White v. WestfallOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Overstreet v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- State v. HowellHamilton County Municipal Court · 1994
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. StiverOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.