State v. Howell
Hamilton County Municipal Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
This case is before the court as a result of a preliminary hearing. The issue is whether there is probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed and, if so, that the defendant committed it. Crim.R. 5(B)(4).
I — I
Facts
Defendant, Tenna Howell, went to Walt Sweeney Automotive, Inc. (hereinafter “Sweeney”), a local automobile dealership, on January 7, 1994 to purchase á pickup truck. The salesman had been informed, by a finance company, that defendant had an approved loan, contingent upon defendant providing proof of income by January 10, 1994. Defendant chose a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Grogan Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. GottfriedOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. ShimitsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GlennHamilton County Municipal Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. LathamOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. McMillenOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. TaylorClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2005
- State v. KeithOhio Court of Appeals · 1999