Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided May 25, 1994No. 94-CRA-3330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

This case is before the court as a result of a preliminary hearing. The issue is whether there is probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed and, if so, that the defendant committed it. Crim.R. 5(B)(4).

I — I

Facts

Defendant, Tenna Howell, went to Walt Sweeney Automotive, Inc. (hereinafter “Sweeney”), a local automobile dealership, on January 7, 1994 to purchase á pickup truck. The salesman had been informed, by a finance company, that defendant had an approved loan, contingent upon defendant providing proof of income by January 10, 1994. Defendant chose a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grogan Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. GottfriedOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. ShimitsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. GlennHamilton County Municipal Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. LathamOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. McMillenOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. TaylorClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2005
  5. State v. KeithOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API