Legal Opinion

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 20, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00526Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 B&G FOODS NORTH AMERICA, INC., No. 2:20-cv-00526-KJM-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 KIM EMBRY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Before the court are three discovery motions: 1) Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 18 181); 2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent (ECF No. 183); and 3) Plaintiff’s 19 renewed Motion to Compel a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent (ECF No. 202). As the two motions to 20 compel are duplicative, ECF No. 183 will be denied as moot as it has been superseded by ECF 21 No.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marlyn Sali v. Corona Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Gloria Rios v. F. Calvin Bigler, M.D. And Lauren A. Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Richard Thorn and Pat Curran v. Sundstrand Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Singh v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. De-La-Cruz-CastroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API