Legal Opinion

United States v. De-La-Cruz-Castro

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 7, 2002No. 00-2286PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Ramon De-La-Cruz Castro (Cruz Castro) appeals from the judgment entered by the district court pursuant to a written plea agreement. Asserting that Cruz Castro waived his right to appeal in the plea agreement, the government asks us to dismiss the appeal. Cruz Castro argues that we should disregard the waiver of appeal because it was not knowing and voluntary, and that we should vacate his judgment of conviction because of an oral agreement that he claims he made with the prosecution. Cruz Castro also claims that he only assented to the plea agreement because of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. AlegriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Creech v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United States v. Francisco Antonio Gil-QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Padilla-ColónCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Todd J. Crider v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. United States v. MilianoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API