Legal Opinion

Richard Equipment Corp. v. Manhattan Industrial Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 19, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for injuries to property, the appeal is from an order denying a motion for summary judgment striking out the answer. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, motion granted, and matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed herein. In support of the motion it was shown by the affidavit of an apparently disinterested eyewitness, and by the deposition of respondent’s employee taken in an examination of respondent before trial that, in the interior of premises occupied by appellant, a heavy and large…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Horowitz v. Kevah Konner, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Baroff v. BeckerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
  5. Cebula v. BonimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API