Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1974No. 48157PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREEN, Commissioner.

Appellant, in a trial by jury, was convicted of rape. Punishment was assessed by the jury at life imprisonment.

Appellant presents nine grounds of error on appeal. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and, therefore, only a brief recitation of the facts will be necessary.

The evidence reflects that on November 16, 1971, the complaining witness was in Denton seeking employment. After completing a phone call in front of the General Telephone office the complaining witness was approached by the appellant. The appellant prevented the complaining witness from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Haywood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Sanne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. State v. HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API