Legal Opinion

Riggs v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2004No. 49S02-0406-CR-246PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

The removal of a juror after deliberations have begun requires a record establishing that the deliberations of the other jurors were not prejudiced by the removal and that cause existed for removal without depriving the defendant of his right to a jury trial. In this case a juror was removed without establishing the need to do so, and without taking precautions to prevent the rest of the jury from being improperly influenced. We remand this case for a new trial.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1985, fifteen-year-old TP. was an eighth grader attending school in Indianapolis.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jervis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adrian Durden v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Whiting v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Spears v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Major v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API