Legal Opinion

Adrian Durden v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2018No. 18S-CR-329PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMassa, Justice

Criminal defendants enjoy a constitutional right to an impartial jury. U.S. Const. amend. VI ; Ind. Const. Art. 1, § 13. This right "is a structural guarantee," Carella v. California , 491 U.S. 263 , 268, 109 S.Ct. 2419 , 105 L.Ed.2d 218 (1989) (Scalia, J., concurring), and its "infraction can never be treated as harmless error." Gray v. Mississippi , 481 U.S. 648 , 668, 107 S.Ct. 2045 , 95 L.Ed.2d 622 (1987) (internal quotation marks omitted). But is reversal necessary when the violation resulted directly from the defendant's affirmative actions at trial?

In this case, defense counsel…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Christapher Batchelor v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Derrick Cardosi v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Cody J. Chambless v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Delmar Kelly v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API