Legal Opinion

Moore v. Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 20, 1874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. . Action to recover- for injuries sustained through the negligence of defendant’s employes in running a hand car against- and over plaintiff. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $2,000. Defendant appeals. The facts of the case are found in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

The plaintiff was employed in making some repairs or additions to -the earth-works of a switch on defendant’s railroad, near a station and water tank. About the close of a day’s work a team of horses, which he, with others, was using, took fright and ran toward him. At the time he was near, within a pace or so, of the main track of the railroad, and did not observe the frightened team until it was within one rod of him. To avoid the horses plaintiff stepped upon the railroad, and a hand ear, operated by defendant’s workmen, ran against him, inflicting the injuries which are the foundation of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frandsen v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Orr v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Nicoll v. SweetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Laverenz v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Kelley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Bunting v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API