Legal Opinion

Dromy v. Lukovsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 2013No. B242952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

Civil Code section 1954, subdivision (b) 1 permits a landlord to enter a dwelling unit to exhibit the premises to prospective or actual purchasers during “normal business hours.” In this case of first impression, we discuss the meaning and scope of the phrase “normal business hours” as it applies to the facts of the pending dispute.

Plaintiff and respondent David Dromy leased a condominium to defendant and appellant Marina Lukovsky. Dromy wishes to sell the property. The trial court issued a declaratory judgment permitting Dromy to hold open houses, under certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gutierrez v. GirardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alta Vista Properties, LLC v. Mauer Vision Center, PcSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Alta Vista Properties, LLC v. Mauer Vision Center, PCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Alta Vista Properties, LLC v. Mauer Vision Center, PcSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API