Janet G. v. New York Foundling Hospital
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Aileen H. Schwartz, J.
The real question in this case is whether the State may use the newly won constitutional rights of minors to relieve itself of all responsibility as parens patriae in dealing with minors who are parents. Not only does the issue pose novel considerations, but its import is of more than limited effect because the facts reveal a system gone amiss and, indeed, unprepared for the singular dilemma of teenage pregnancy in our time.
Janet. G., a 17-year-old minor, alone and unaware of her right of choice and ignorant of the nature and consequences of her…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Sarah K.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hector M. v. Commissioner of Social ServicesNew York City Family Court · 1980
- A. F. v. Spence Chapin AgencyNew York City Family Court · 1989
- In re Petitions for Approval of Adoption SurrendersNew York City Family Court · 1988
- Moorehead v. MooreheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993