Legal Opinion
United States v. Padilla-Valenzuela
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 21, 1995No. CR 95-057 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.Supp. 968 (1995)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Marco Antonio PADILLA-VALENZUELA, Defendant.
No. CR 95-057 TUC JMR.
United States District Court, D. Arizona.
August 21, 1995.
Jesse J. Figueroa, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for plaintiff.
Hector M. Figueroa, Tucson, AZ, for defendant.
ORDER
ROLL, District Judge.
Defendant MARCO ANTONIO PADILLA-VALENZUELA has filed a motion to submit a questionnaire to prospective jurors and motion for attorney conducted voir dire.[1] These motions, in a broader sense, address at what point an attorney's right to gather information about prospective…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. SerafiniDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- United States v. DardenDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018