State v. McGowan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law and/or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. EitzmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. JungOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. StarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. ArledgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.