Legal Opinion

State v. McGowan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2016No. 2015-1596PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law and/or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. EitzmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. JungOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. StarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. ArledgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API