Legal Opinion

State v. Jung

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 2018No. 105928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, A.J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Matthew Jung appeals the sentences imposed by the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas in three cases, Case Nos. CR-14-584243-A, CR-14-591390-A and CR-14-591534-C, after he violated community control sanctions. Jung contends that his sentences in all three cases should be vacated because the record does not support the imposition of maximum sentences and the trial court improperly imposed postrelease control for an unclassified felony in CR-14-591390. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the portion of Jung's sentence in CR-14-591390 that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. FraleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HintonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. StephensOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. MondieOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. PruittOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API